Affiliate Disclosure: We are reader-supported. We may earn a small commission from affiliate links at no extra cost to you. All of our reviews are independently conducted.
When it comes to outdoor expeditions, particularly those that beckon us onto the winding trails and rugged terrains of the British Isles, the talk of footwear is as varied as the landscapes themselves. Enter Crocs – the subject of one of the most spirited debates in the hiking community. Synonymous with comfort and leisure, these foam-based, hole-punctured shoes have tiptoed into the conversation about hiking gear. And why not? With their lightweight design and breathable structure, they offer an intriguing alternative to the conventional, often cumbersome, hiking boots.
But can a pair of shoes more commonly found by the poolside truly stand up to the rigours of the hiking trail? It’s a question that’s bound to elicit a chuckle or even a raised eyebrow among the more seasoned hikers. However, in the spirit of exploration and with an open mind, we embark on a lighthearted journey to dissect the hiking Croc phenomenon.
From the misty peaks of Snowdonia to the scenic pathways of the South West Coast Path, we’ll tread carefully into this debate. This post aims to balance the scales, acknowledging the purist’s perspective while considering the potential of Crocs to offer a different kind of outdoor experience. Could these iconic clogs be the unsung heroes of a casual hiker’s wardrobe or are they simply out of their depth? By the end of this trail of thought, we hope to have a clearer view.
So lace up (or should we say, strap up?) as we delve into the features and benefits of Crocs, compare them with their trail-treading counterparts, and ultimately, gauge whether they can handle the unpredictable British weather and the diverse terrain that makes hiking here a truly unique adventure.
The Love-Hate Relationship with Crocs
In the realm of footwear, Crocs stand out with their distinctive style – they’re the Marmite of the shoe world; you either revel in their quirky comfort or dismiss them as fashion’s faux pas. These lightweight, versatile clogs have carved a niche for themselves, with a fan base that spans from toddlers to gardeners and everyone in between. Yet, when it comes to the serious business of hiking, Crocs tend to split opinions like a rugged trail splits the forest.
For some, Crocs are the epitome of comfort. Their foam construction moulds to the foot, offering a custom fit that’s hard to find in more rigid shoes. They’re celebrated for being airy, quick to dry, and easy to slip on and off – attributes that appeal to the leisurely wanderer and the avid camper alike. Words like “comfortable shoes” and “quick trip” often find themselves in the same sentence as Crocs.
On the other hand, traditional hikers might scoff at the idea. They champion boots that boast ankle support, a sturdy grip, and the kind of robust design that laughs in the face of sharp rocks and slippery slopes. To them, Crocs might seem like an outlandish choice, lacking the necessary support for longer hikes or the protection needed for the rough terrain that characterizes much of Britain’s hiking trails.
Yet, it’s this very divide that makes the discussion around hiking in Crocs so interesting. Could these iconic clogs, known for their casual comfort, make the transition to the hiking trails, or are they destined to remain on the periphery, the choice of footwear for post-hike relaxation rather than the hike itself? The answer isn’t as straightforward as you might think, and it requires us to look beyond prejudices and preconceptions, to explore what Crocs really have to offer to the hikers’ feet.
Features and Benefits of Crocs for Hiking
Crocs are not what comes to mind when picturing a hike through Britain’s verdant countryside or up its craggy peaks. Yet, the features that make Crocs a favourite for gardeners and beachgoers might have more to offer hikers than first assumed.
One of the most lauded features of Crocs is their weight – or lack thereof. These feather-light clogs could mean the difference between feeling sprightly or slogged down after miles of trekking. For those accustomed to the heft of traditional hiking boots, the breezy nature of Crocs could be a welcome reprieve on less demanding trails.
With their signature holes and foam construction, Crocs offer excellent ventilation, keeping feet cooler and less prone to the dampness that can lead to blisters. They’re also non-absorbent and quick drying, a great feature for unexpected wet crossings or the notorious British drizzle. This makes them a potential candidate for short hikes on well-trodden paths or for forays into the outdoors when heavy-duty waterproofing isn’t a necessity.
The contoured footbed of Crocs is praised for its comfort, which can be crucial on long-distance hikes. Their foam material allows for a degree of cushioning that adapts to the foot over time. For those with foot issues or who find the rigid structure of typical hiking shoes uncomfortable, Crocs could present a more forgiving option.
Crocs’ ease of use is another point in their favour. They transition smoothly from a casual walk in the park to a spontaneous jaunt on a nature trail. For the casual hiker who values simplicity, this could be quite appealing.
However, the benefits must be weighed against safety concerns. The traction on Crocs, while suitable for flat and dry surfaces, will not provide the grip needed for the steep inclines or muddy conditions often encountered on British hiking trails. Unfortunately, the open design offers little protection against the elements or the accidental stub against a hidden root or rock.
With benefits such as ‘foam construction’ and ‘quick drying’, you must ponder if these features make Crocs a viable option for hikers. They may not replace the rugged build of a hiking boot, but they could serve as an adjunct – a lightweight, comfortable option for certain conditions and terrains, particularly during the warmer and drier months. As we venture into the comparison with other hiking footwear, it becomes increasingly clear that while Crocs might not be the ‘right hiking shoe’ for every trail, they have carved out their own niche in the outdoor gear landscape.
Crocs vs Hiking Sandals
When considering alternative hiking footwear, hiking sandals are often the first port of call for those seeking a break from traditional boots. Here, we weigh the pros and cons of Crocs against their strappy counterparts.
Hiking sandals, like Crocs, offer a liberating break from the confines of boots. They provide a level of breathability that’s unmatched, ideal for keeping feet cool and comfortable on a hot day’s hike. Crocs share this open design, but with a more substantial upper, offering a different balance between ventilation and protection.
One of the critical areas where hiking sandals often have the upper hand is in the traction department. They are specifically designed with rugged soles to grip the uneven and challenging surfaces found on many hiking trails. Crocs, though improved with their ‘All Terrain’ options, may still lag in providing the confidence needed on slippery or steep paths.
Another point to consider is the secure fit offered by hiking sandals, with adjustable straps that ensure the footwear stays put, even in challenging conditions. Crocs, with their more relaxed fit, may pose a risk of slipping off at inopportune moments, though models with an adjustable heel strap aim to mitigate this issue.
Both Crocs and hiking sandals excel in environments where water is involved. They are quick to dry and provide an easy solution for river crossings or beach-side strolls. However, in terms of “water shoes,” hiking sandals might offer more in the way of foot protection with their closed-toe designs.
Where Crocs might outshine hiking sandals is in the comfort stakes. The softer material can feel more forgiving, particularly on longer hikes where foot fatigue sets in. The ‘classic hiker clog’ model of Crocs, designed with a more robust sole and enhanced coverage, attempts to bridge the gap between the carefree comfort of the original Croc and the practicality demanded by hikers.
Both Crocs and hiking sandals present themselves as viable options for those seeking a lighter, more breathable alternative to boots. While hiking sandals may offer better security and traction, Crocs bring a unique comfort and ease that could make them suitable for more casual hikes, short distances, or as camp shoes after a day’s trek. The choice ultimately hinges on the type of hike, the terrain, and personal preference for comfort versus stability.
Crocs vs Traditional Hiking Shoes
The classic hiking shoe is a staple in the walker’s wardrobe, designed to tackle a wide array of terrains and weather conditions. How do Crocs compare to these tried-and-tested trail companions?
Traditional hiking shoes are built to last. They’re constructed with tough materials to withstand the abrasive elements of the trail, from sharp rocks to thorny underbrush. Crocs, while durable in their own right, are made from a softer foam that may not offer the same level of protection against the relentless wear and tear of regular hiking.
A crucial aspect of traditional hiking footwear is the support it provides. With structured designs that embrace the foot and ankle, these shoes are engineered to reduce the risk of injury on uneven ground. Crocs, particularly the more classic styles, lack the support needed for rough terrain, posing a risk for twists or sprains. Some of the newer models have addressed this with more robust soles and adjustable straps, but they still fall well short of the support offered by regular hiking shoes.
The soles of hiking shoes are a key feature of their design, crafted to provide optimal grip on a variety of surfaces. They’re thick, providing a barrier between the foot and the often unforgiving ground. Crocs, on the other hand, typically feature a thinner sole, which might be comfortable for casual wear but could prove punishing over long distances or on particularly rugged trails.
In the UK, where the skies can open up without warning, the waterproof nature of hiking shoes is a godsend. They are designed to keep feet dry even in the wettest conditions. While Crocs are water-friendly and quick to dry, they don’t provide the same level of protection from getting wet in the first place, which could lead to discomfort on longer treks.
Despite these shortcomings, there’s a case to be made for Crocs in the hiking world. For one, they can be incredibly convenient for shorter hikes or as a secondary pair of shoes to change into post-hike, offering feet a respite from the confines of heavier boots. They’re also an excellent option for campsite wandering or as a part of the gear for a multi-activity outdoor adventure, where their versatility shines.
While Crocs offer certain benefits such as comfort and ease of use, they simply cannot replace traditional hiking shoes when it comes to the more demanding aspects of hiking. They lack the support, protection, and traction that are essential for tackling the diverse and often challenging British landscapes. However, as part of a hiker’s kit, especially for those leisurely days or as an after-hike relief, Crocs could very well find their place.
The British Hiking Scene
The UK presents a unique set of challenges for any hiker, with its famously unpredictable weather and varied landscapes. From the rolling hills of the Cotswolds to the rugged terrain of the Scottish Highlands, each trail demands something different from your footwear.
In the UK, the weather can be as varied as the accents. A day that starts with sunshine can quickly turn to rain, hail, or even snow in some areas. While Crocs are praised for their quick-drying features, they offer little in the way of warmth or water resistance, making them less than ideal for the often wet conditions encountered on British trails.
British hikes can take you over a smorgasbord of terrains – muddy fields, steep fells, rocky paths, and everything in between. Traditional hiking shoes are designed with these challenges in mind, providing the grip and stability needed to navigate safely. Crocs, with their smoother soles and flexible material, may struggle to provide the same level of confidence, especially on slippery or uneven ground.
However, not all hikes demand the fortitude of a waterproof boot. On well-maintained paths or during the drier months, the lightweight and breathable nature of Crocs could be an asset, keeping your feet cool and comfortable on less strenuous walks.
While Crocs might find a place on the gentler paths and in the casual hiker’s heart, the consensus among British hikers will undoubtedly lean towards more traditional hiking footwear. That said, Crocs could be considered for certain types of hikes – perhaps a quick jaunt in the countryside or a short walk on a sunny day.
The adaptability of Crocs to the British hiking landscape is, at best, limited. They might be well-suited to casual, short-distance walks on clear days, but for the quintessential British hike – which could involve any weather and any terrain – they fall short. The ideal hiking shoe is one that can handle rocky terrain, wet conditions, and still keep your feet comfortable over longer distances. For those hikes, it’s best to stick with the traditional hiking boots or shoes.
Popular Crocs for Hiking
With an array of Crocs models available, it’s worth considering which ones could be deemed ‘hike-worthy’. Here we explore some popular options that are more tailored to outdoor activities, even if they might not replace your trusty hiking boots.
Classic Lined Neo Puff Boot
These boots take the iconic Croc comfort and add a layer of warmth with a lined interior, something that’s a nod towards the colder British weather. With a more boot-like appearance and enhanced coverage, they’re a step towards bridging the gap between casual Crocs and outdoor footwear.Buy from Amazon
Designed with a more rugged outsole and enhanced tread, the All-Terrain Clog is Crocs’ answer to the call of the wild. While they won’t rival the grip of dedicated hiking shoes, they do offer an improved experience over the standard models for those who are set on Crocs for their outdoor adventures.Buy from Amazon
Offroad Sport Clog
This model boasts a more aggressive design with a thicker, more robust sole and a sportier look. It’s touted as being suitable for activities that take you off the beaten path, though how far off that path they can go is up for debate.Buy from Amazon
These boots offer a sleeker look with the promise of Crocs comfort. They could be considered for urban hikes or leisurely walks in the park, where the terrain isn’t too demanding, and the style is just as important as function.Buy from Amazon
Classic Hiker Clog
With a design that hints at a more traditional hiking shoe aesthetic, the Classic Hiker Clog could serve well for those looking for the Crocs brand of comfort with a nod to the hiking world. It’s possibly the most appropriate for light trails and short day hikes.Buy from Amazon
The Bottom Line
Although some Crocs models are marketed towards the outdoor enthusiast, they remain a contentious choice for traditional hiking. They may serve as an unconventional alternative for light outdoor activities, short hikes, or as a comfortable option post-hike, but for those venturing into the heart of the British countryside, where conditions are unpredictable and terrain can be challenging, they’re unlikely to replace the specialised footwear designed for such environments.